T-Mobile US, Inc.

(NASDAQ Global Select)
Somewhat Bearish -45

T-Mobile class action alleges company failed to honor $200 gift card promotion - Class Action Lawsuits

πŸ“ A class action lawsuit filed on Nov. 12 alleges T-Mobile failed to provide $200 gift cards promised for new phone line purchases.

βš–οΈ Plaintiff Purya Ghrabeti claims he was misled by a store representative and is seeking restitution for California consumers.

πŸ“ The case, Ghrabeti v. T-Mobile USA Inc., is pending in the Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside.

⚠️ The complaint alleges violations of California consumer protection laws due to false advertising and deceptive practices.

πŸ‘₯ Ghrabeti seeks a jury trial and represents a class of customers who purchased based on non-existent promotional offers.

πŸ“‰ T-Mobile is simultaneously facing other litigation regarding unauthorized switches to more expensive cell phone plans.

Bullish Signals
  • The article provides specific details about the legal filing, including the case number (5:25-cv-03031) and the specific court jurisdiction.
  • It identifies the plaintiff's legal representation by the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman P.C., offering a clear path for potential class members to find counsel.
Risk Factors
  • The lawsuit alleges T-Mobile engaged in false advertising and deceptive business practices by promising $200 gift cards that were not delivered.
  • Plaintiff claims customers were induced to make purchases based on promises that the company allegedly did not intend to fulfill.
  • The complaint asserts violations of California state consumer protection laws, suggesting potential regulatory scrutiny or fines.
  • T-Mobile is currently facing additional legal claims regarding unauthorized plan switches, indicating a pattern of customer service disputes.
Full Analysis
A new class action lawsuit has been filed against T-Mobile USA Inc. in California state court, alleging the company failed to honor a promotional offer of $200 gift cards for each new phone line purchased. Plaintiff Purya Ghrabeti filed the complaint on November 12, claiming he was induced to buy additional lines based on a promise confirmed by a store representative that was subsequently denied. The lawsuit asserts that T-Mobile engaged in false advertising and deceptive business practices under California consumer protection laws by promoting an offer it did not intend to fulfill. Ghrabeti seeks to represent a class of California consumers who purchased new devices or lines based on similar financial incentives but did not receive the promised rewards, demanding restitution and injunctive relief. The article notes that T-Mobile is currently facing other claims regarding unauthorized plan switches despite a lifetime guarantee. The specific case, Ghrabeti v. T-Mobile USA Inc., is assigned Case No. 5:25-cv-03031 in the Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside and is represented by the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman P.C.